Monthly Archives: December 2008

Legislative Agenda: Who Will Stop the Spreading of Human Waste on our Farmfields?

For years, residents of Virginia have been subjected to the incredibly disgusting practice of spreading human waste, euphemistically called ‘biosolids’, on our farm fields.

Virginia’s Supreme Court in 2002 refused to allow a county in Virginia to deny the application of this material to lands in their county. At a time when health is of primary concern to many people, the idea that human waste is trucked to my county is anathema to this good health.

Part of the problem has been the Republican-dominated legislature in years past, who, even when given the opportunity, voted down any measure designed to curb or even test this material to determine if it is contributing to the poor health of Virginia’s citizens.

Watkins Abbitt, who I am not a fan of, has introduced legislation in the past to try to look into this practice, but the bills he introduced were watered down versions, more of an industry support bill. None of them passed.

The other part of this problem deals with the trucking lobby, which makes millions for it’s drivers every year, by defeating such legislation. It wouldn’t be the first time something like this happened, but it does seem strange that Abbitt takes plenty of money from trucking interests who would benefit from leaving the law alone. I forget who, but someone even claimed that the Bush Administration EPA refused to test this material to determine what compounds are included in this toxic soup.

Instead of lip service being paid to this issue, I would like to see a legislator stand up and say ‘No More’.

In any case, this practice must stop.

Payday Lenders Go Viral on Your Blog

More and more comments to my blog and others (including Democratic Central) are from either actual employees of the payday lending business, or are meant to ‘link drop’ so their employer’s website has a presence, like advertising, on the web.

Their comments seem very conversational, and try to be friendly, but in the end, they are like one-night stands; they disappear, never to be heard from again.

Why is This Legal?

I have been talking for some time here about the sorry state of government in Prince Edward County, to my south, and to me a lot of the problems come down to one question really.

Why is it legal for James Ennis to be both County Attorney and Commonwealth’s Attorney?

As you may have read in many a previous article of mine, there was a Grand Jury inquiry into shady dealings with land belonging to the county which produced very lukewarm results considering the facts of this travesty of governance.

If Mr. Ennis hold both offices, how does he defend the County and the region at the same time? Doesn’t this create a huge conflict of interest?

More dealings of the county since the one referenced above have Mr. Ennis’ fingerprints all over them. A telephone vote of Supervisors (illegal in Virginia) to approve a pipeline for water from wells that weren’t drilled with permits, to a private development that already has a water supply. Complicity in hiding documents concerning the above land sale. ‘Throwing’ the Grand Jury in order for the County to not be named in a fraud suit. These and many more are there waiting for resolution by the law.

Jack Houghton and Supervisor Lacy Ward have waged this battle, mostly by themselves, and it is time for Prince Edward County government to be called on all of this nefarious activity.

How can Mr. Ennis both prosecute himself and defend himself?

Signs of Winter

Snow melts from campaign signs in an unusual way.

Snow melts from campaign signs in an unusual way.

Is This What They Mean By Marriage?

If the Biblical definition of marriage is the goal, I would remind everyone:

A. Marriage in the United States shall consist of a union between one man and one or more women. (Gen 29:17-28; II Sam 3:2-5)

B. Marriage shall not impede a man’s right to take concubines in addition to his wife or wives. (II Sam 5:13; I Kings 11:3; II Chron 11:21)

C. A marriage shall be considered valid only if the wife is a virgin. If the wife is not a virgin, she shall be executed. (Deut 22:13-21)

D. Marriage of a believer and a non-believer shall be forbidden. (Gen 24:3; Num 25:1-9; Ezra 9:12; Neh 10:30)

E. Since marriage is for life, neither this Constitution nor the constitution of any State, nor any state or federal law, shall be construed to permit divorce. (Deut 22:19; Mark 10:9)

F. If a married man dies without children, his brother shall marry the widow. If he refuses to marry his brother’s widow or deliberately does not give her children, he shall pay a fine of one shoe and be otherwise punished in a manner to be determined by law. (Gen 38:6-10; Deut 25:5-10)

G. In lieu of marriage, if there are no acceptable men in your town, it is required that you get your dad drunk and have sex with him (even if he had previously offered you up as a sex toy to men young and old), tag-teaming with any sisters you may have. Of course, this rule applies only if you are female. (Gen 19:31-36)

Somehow, I think the fundies and the marriage bigots would not think this would be okay.

H/T: gladkov in this diary

Prince Edward Chair of BOS Refuses to Answer Questions About Anything

As I have discussed here many times before, The Southside Messenger is not afraid to point out the failings of local government, even if other news outlets are. This time is about a familiar subject: Bucky Fore, the Chair of the Prince Edward County Board of Supervisors. The article in the November 27 – December 3, 2008 newspaper recounts that this is the third time in recent months that questions from both citizens and the Messenger have been left unanswered either in session or in other communications.

I will let reporter extraordinaire Wilkie Chaffin fill you in:

For the third time in recent months, Prince Edward County supervisors have been questioned about an apparently illegal action taken by the Board of Supervisors in November of 2007. The charge was first made publicly in a Southside Messenger article in June of this year, after a citizen, Jack Houghton, accidently learned of a letter that described a commitment that the county had made. The Messenger article described how Prince Edward County supervisors made the decision to provide water to The Manor golf complex based on a secret phone call survey to certain supervisors instead of taking a vote in a public meeting as is required by law. In October of 2008, Supervisor Lacy Ward asked that a Board committee be set up to examine the relevant circumstances of this action and issue a written report of its findings. The other seven supervisors voted against setting up this committee. At the regular November 12, 2008 Board of Supervisors meeting, Jack Houghton raised the matter of this action and asked “if members of the Board would like to comment, to explain your actions, to justify why you forgot in this case the vital importance of transparency, and went ahead to apparently violate Virginia’s open meeting law.” Supervisors Fore, Simpson, Jones, Gilfillan, Moore, and McKay, along with County Administrator Bartlett and County Attorney Ennis, were all involved in this action that has been questioned. Yet, apparently, only Supervisor Bobby Jones has denied the charge that the action was illegal, or tried to explain or justify the action. Supervisor Jones said in October that he had a document that would explain this action. However, no document has been produced.

Previous articles have focused on VFOIA violations, and selective use of public hearings when it seems certain that one would be required, and many more. The latest giveaway to the Manor Resort, which I have been told is on shaky financial ground, is the water infrastructure spoken of in Mr. Chaffin’s article. Part of a recent agreement paid off or forgave amounts owed to the county by the CDA formed to initially start the ‘Manor’, formerly known as Poplar Hill.

At a November 18, 2008 special meeting called by Chairman William Fore, the Board discussed priorities for Prince Edward capital projects. Supervisors were asked to rank six possible projects. Supervisors gave the highest ranking to a $2.5 million utilities agreement with the Town of Farmville, and the lowest ranking to the proposed water plant and distribution system, which at this meeting was estimated to cost between $15 million and $25 million. The construction of a new library was given the second highest ranking ($2.8 – $3.1 million in cost), with the Sandy River Reservoir intake ($4.0 million), an industrial park site development ($1.3 million), and school construction/renovation projects ($1.1 million) receiving ranking of three, four, and five in that order. Supervisor Sally Gilfillan asked the Board to agree to fund the county’s portion of the library costs before the financially attractive construction bid expires. Supervisors have agreed previously to pay a financial consultant, Davenport and Co., $10,000 to prepare a financial report concerning the general financial condition of the county and the ability of the county to afford projects such as those ranked at this meeting. Board Chairman Fore said he believed that supervisor rankings would change after the Davenport report was received. The Board then spent considerable time discussing the proposed water and sewer utilities agreement with the town. In return for $2.5 million from the county, the Town of Farmville would agree to turn over a portion of its water supply and wastewater system outside of the town to Prince Edward County. The town would also agree to provide a potable water supply and to provide treatment and disposal of wastewater for certain county areas outside of the town’s service area. Supervisor Lacy Ward asked why third parties were a part of this agreement and suggested that the agreement would mean that the Poplar Hill Community Development Authority (CDA) will not have to pay the money that it owes to the Town of Farmville. County Attorney James Ennis said that these provisions would eliminate future litigation on matters related to a 2000 agreement and were in this agreement at the request of Farmville. The Board of Supervisors approved the agreement with the town, with Supervisor Ward voting no. Mr. Ward said he did not want taxpayer money to pay off debts made by the CDA. The signing of the agreement by the county and town was scheduled to be held the next day.

Constant pressure is being applied by Mr. Houghton, Mr. Chaffin, and Mr. Ward, a Prince Edward County Supervisor, to get at the truth. What will it take? Will there need to be another Grand Jury? Oops, did that already. You see, the Commonwealth’s Attorney is also the County Attorney. That should be illegal, and there should be a corrupt institutions investigation of Prince Edward County Board of Supervisors.