I absolutely believe everyone should express themselves. However, even
‘free expression” can contain uber-hyperbolic accusations and insults. Such is the case with some teabagger bloggers in the Fifth Congressional District.
One thing I need to mention first. Just because a person and some of their friends are of the same mind, it does not mean that it equals an overwhelming number, or a majority. Teabaggers like to think that their viewpoint is the only one with merit, so many times the discussions with them degrade into them claiming superiority and them defending the ‘one true way’.
These are not good discussions or blog posts, they are not discussions of the merits of differing viewpoints for the most part.
Reasonable Response is a blog such as what I have described. Recently, articles on this blog have become more and more inflammatory. The one I will feature here is particularly despicable, in that it talks about support/non-support of Israel.
Inflamed Hyperbolic Disease
Even though he claims to be a moderate, Congressman Tom Perriello’s radical left-wing connections are well documented. He’s been linked to the far-left VoteVets.org, MoveOn.org, and other leftist fringe groups. Now comes another one. Perriello, a Democrat, was recently endorsed for re-election by an interest group called “J-Street.” Along with Perriello, another 40 candidates were endorsed by J-Street including such liberal icons as Barney Frank and Charles Rangel.
Try again, Skippy. Vote-Vets is an organization that looks after the needs and problems of veterans of our armed forces. Move-On? Don’t you get tired of vilifying an organization that isn’t going away? It remains a major force in grassroots (the real kind, not Koch Bros./AFP or FreedomWorks) advocacy and organizing in this country. Are you saying there is no such organization for the right wing/teabaggers? Shame, that.
J-Street is endorsed by lots of people. Maybe just nobody you like. They believe in including peace as a possible outcome in negotiations to solve the Palestinian/Israeli impasse. Not just war, not a co-existing state, 2 states. And peace.
J-Street is funded by George Soros, the backer of a number of radical left organizations. And while it bills itself as pro-Israel and pro-peace, it actually is neither. It is so anti-Israel that Israel’s Ambassador to the US refused to attend a J-Street conference because the policies advocated by the organization would seriously harm Israel. In fact, J-Street displays a consistent track record of hostility towards Israel. Yet the group likes Perriello. And when an interest group likes a candidate enough to endorse him before an opponent has even been selected, you can be pretty sure it believes the candidate supports the policies it is promoting.
Wrong again, Sparky.
A venerated publication such as American Conservative has written that George Soros is not presently a contributor to J-Street. He left the organization in order for them to do their work, and so he wouldn’t be the lightening rod focus of people who dislike him.
From Wikipedia:
J Street’s founding Executive Director is Jeremy Ben-Ami, a former domestic policy adviser in the Clinton Administration.[5] Ben-Ami has deep ties to Israel: His grandparents were among the founders of Tel Aviv, his parents were Israelis, his family suffered in the Holocaust, and he has lived in Israel, where he was almost blown up in a Jerusalem terror attack.[6] Ben-Ami has worked for many years with Jewish peace groups, including the Center for Middle East Peace and the Geneva Initiative-North America.[3][15]
The initial support of J Street came from multi-billionaire George Soros, who for a brief time was associated with the organization. Soros pulled out before the initial launch, so as not to negatively affect the group.[16](American Conservative Magazine)
From J-Street website:
J Street represents Americans, primarily but not exclusively Jewish, who support Israel and its desire for security as the Jewish homeland, as well as the right of the Palestinians to a sovereign state of their own – two states living side-by-side in peace and security. We believe ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is in the best interests of Israel, the United States, the Palestinians, and the region as a whole.
Are you saying that peace is not what we want? That you and your friends want to kill more people, including our own, who go to war over Israel? When are you signing up to serve? In any case, what does participation and endorsement from this group of Tom Perriello jeopardize anything in your life? Should he have the freedom of association, presumably like you do?
Saying Tom Perriello is anti-Israel is stupid. He wants peace in Israel, the hardest and most satisfying possible route, in my opinion, to an end to the violence and death there.
The other blogger I am featuring today asks the burning question, “Does Tom Perriello have a Problem With Free Speech?“
Wow. Quite the opposite. Have you ever called Tom’s office, Bill Hay? Have you gotten answers?
Tom obviously does not agree with this ruling and some may say he has a problem with the first amendment.
Really? “Some” say? Who, Bill? Who says that Tom Perriello has a problem with the First Amendment to the Constitution? These are some nasty allegations.
No facts? Just make up someone who is “some say” and there you have it. No facts, no credibility.